Hello, everyone, and welcome back to the Puzzle Box!
These last couple weeks have been pretty fun! I know there are at least a few of you who have been trying out the formats I’ve presented here. That is really flattering—thanks, guys! This week, I am going to be continuing of this meta-series (as Mark Rosewater puts it in his podcasts) of little-known Cube formats. This week I’ll be leaving the world of two-man formats and moving into four-man. This format is simply called “Twos.”
What is Twos and How Do You Play?
- Twos is a format that has two teams of players who share a life total of 25. Teams are randomly chosen as team A and team B. Players sit in ABAB order to draft so team mates are not sitting beside each other. Draft as normal: three packs per person.
- Once each person has his or her draft pool, players build their decks apart from one another so no one knows what’s in anyone else’s deck—including team members!
- After all of the deck are built, players sit in the same order around the table—ABAB.
- The person who plays first is randomly decided. Turns go in clockwise order, and the first player draws.
- Each team member may attack either one of his opponents, and any damage that gets through decreases the team’s shared life total. Team members cannot block for each other. However, they can play spells that affect either a creature or spell that is targeting their other team mate. For example, if an opponent is attacking your teammate with a [card]Baneslayer Angel[/card] you can [card]Doom Blade[/card] it, but you can’t block it with your [card]Lingering Souls[/card] token. You can counter a [card]Lighting Bolt[/card] that is targeting a teammate’s face or creature, or counter a counter that is countering your teammate’s counter. All that is to say: everyone can affect everyone else within the normal rules of Magic.
- No sideboarding
- After the first game, the two team members on the losing team roll to see who goes first for the next game.
- Discussion between team members is allowed. You can tell your teammate what’s in your hand and the contents of your entire deck. The catch: nothing can be said in secret—if you are going to say something it must be said so the opposing team can hear.
- Best two out of three wins it.
- At my local shop, players often put a few dollars on the line to make things extra spicy.
This Format is F-A-S-T
If you take a second to think about how fast the normal 1v1 cube environment is, you’ll realize that it is pretty fast. Two-power one-drops are an absolute staple, and as WotC continues to make better ones with fewer draw backs—like our dear friend [card]Carnophage[/card]—it is trending toward speeding up even further. Anything that costs five mana should be a game winner. Anything that costs six or more will require you to have a deck full of sweepers and counter spells, ways to ramp to it in the early parts of the game, or a plan on cheating it into play without paying its mana cost.
Now just take everything you just read, then remove any consistent expectation of blocking from the equation. Chances are good that either you or you teammate will not have a creature to block an opponent’s attacking creature, and if both of you do, the chances are equally as good that an opponent will have a way to clear the path.
Your valuation of cards changes drastically in this format as well. Here is a pack-one pick-one scenario that I saw a couple of weeks ago: the two cards in the pack that really mattered were [card]Skullclamp[/card] and [card]Guttersnipe[/card]. Snap [card]Skullclamp[/card], right? It goes in every deck with creatures and [card]Guttersnipe[/card] will wheel if you feel like playing that deck anyways…right?
Let me describe a late-game scenario that will show you the power of cards that specify “each opponent.”
It’s my turn five and I attack my opponent’s life total down to three. One of them does not have a blocker and my teammate has an army that only a sweeper could handle. We are 11 life. There’s a catch: the opponent to my left has a Guttersnipe out, three untapped mana and a single card in hand.
Spoiler Alert: Take a second to try and figure out what card that could be that would let them win on their upkeep.
At the end of my turn, he plays a [card]Staggershock[/card] targeting my face for two. [card]Guttersnipe[/card]’s ability triggers and hits me for another two and then my teammate for two—that’s six damage for three mana at instant speed. [card]Staggershock[/card] then rebounds and domes us for another six, ending the game during my opponent’s upkeep. That is 12 damage for a total investment of six mana and two cards. This may sound like Magical Christmas land, but the guys that I have played with know the power of this card, so this Christmas scenario comes up often.
There is only one Twos list on Cube Tutor that I know of, and you may notice that some of the cards look pretty strange. As soon as you realize that all of those cards affect each of your opponents separately, and that teammates share life totals, those cards skyrocket in value! [card]Tithe Drinker[/card] is one of the best two-drops in the format because it attacks for two and drains the opposing team’s life total for two every time you extort, not to mention two life for you on each trigger. It’s not uncommon to see [card]Tithe Drinker[/card] lowering your opponents’ life total by four each turn it’s alive.
Potentially Very Different Lists
A cube list that is specialized towards playing Twos looks very different and tries to exploit speed and multiple-opponent effects. For instance, every cheap card with extort goes in, cards that are very good at blocking and stalling to get to the long game get cut. Cards like this would be [card]Wall of Omens[/card] and [card]Wall or Roots[/card], or anything that only blocks.
General value creatures that are above four mana need to be seriously reconsidered, and most likely replaced with a one- or a two-drop. Because of the higher concentration of X/1’s, cards like [card]Gut Shot[/card], [card]Lava Dart[/card], and even [card]Forge Devil[/card] become playable and often are key cards in a match.
You can, of course, use more of a standard cube and it will be just as fun. Just keep in mind the environment is really different.
In closing, if I haven’t conveyed that this format is a real blast to play, I’m afraid I haven’t done it justice! This is by far my most favorite way to cube. I like it better than 1v1 for sure, simply because of the team aspect of it. Trying to talk in code about whether or not to [card]Force of Will[/card] something, and then just giving up and talking about the cards in your hand, makes the mood really light and fun!
Alright, I’ll be back next week with substitutions for our current Puzzle Box list, but for now, give Twos a try! You’ll enjoy yourself immensely, I promise.
Thanks for hangin’, everyone!
P.S. Shout out to PIDGEOT on Cube Tutor for letting me use his list as a reference. Here’s another link.
7 comments on Puzzle Box – Four-Person Cube Format: Twos
Nice article. Spread the word about 2s, most fun cube format not close. It sounds like a nooby format, but it really tests your magic skill, putting you in new situations than you’d find in a regular 1s game.
Also worth noting it’s usually easier to get 4 people together than 6-8 (for us usually) and a draft and best of three can usually be completed in approx 2hrs. Makes it nice for the busily scheduled groups.
Oh and just for the record you were at 17, EoT staggershock, upkeep Electrolyze for 18 with the Guttersnipe. I’m sure you simplified it for the article, or it was so traumatizing that you blocked it from your memory.
Thanks for the comments, I think I was just in shock, because I just remembered almost winning and then scooping up… everything else was a blur.
I just dug out all the two’s cards from my collection and placed an order for the rest of them. I’m trying to distill the essential two’s cards for a substitution list for the current puzzle box in the next article.
any thoughts on the Puzzle Pox List as is right now? Any snap cuts other than all of the defenders? http://cubetutor.com/viewcube/5381